AI mentoring
A 1-to-1 with every single person.
Surveys capture what people will tick. Conversations capture what they mean. Marv does both, at the scale of the whole business.
Marv
No names leave this chat. What is the one thing quietly draining your energy?
We keep re-deciding things that were already decided.
Marv
That is a real cost. Is it usually before or after a decision has been communicated widely?
Private to you. Only themes are shared, never transcripts.
From many voices to one signal
It tells you the things a 1 to 5 never will.
Not 'morale is 3.4', but the specific, recurring thing draining it, and what people would change.
Mentor report, Engineering
18 conversations
Decision rework
Recognition gap
Tooling friction
"Decision rework" appears in 13 of 18 conversations. Marv recommends a decision-rights workshop this fortnight.
Anonymous by design
People tell Marv what they would never put in a survey.
It works because it is genuinely safe. Only clustered themes roll up, never below a minimum group size, never a name.
1:1
With everyone, not a sample
∞
Scales to the whole org
0
Calendars to coordinate
24/7
On their own time
Hear what your people actually think.
Explore a sample mentor report, live in the demo.